Which theory would most likely argue for the dispersal of naval forces?

Corbett's philosophy emphasizes the importance of maritime strategy that adapts to the dynamics of naval warfare, advocating for flexibility and the effective use of naval forces across different theaters. One of the key tenets of Corbett's theory is that dispersing naval forces can enhance security and create opportunities for decisive maneuvers against enemy forces, allowing for a more strategic approach to engagements and the overall maritime campaign.

Dispersal of naval forces according to Corbett allows for greater coverage and the ability to respond to threats across a wider area. This approach helps to counteract the concentrated enemy forces while maintaining the capacity to exploit localized advantages. It contrasts with more concentrated strategies, which might limit operational flexibility and increase vulnerability.

In this context, while Mahan's philosophy tends to focus on the concentration of naval power to achieve decisive battles and strategies, and Clausewitz's ideas emphasize the broader context of war including land forces and decisive engagements, Corbett's perspective distinctly highlights the advantages of dispersing forces as a means of ensuring greater strategic flexibility in maritime operations. This understanding aligns with historical practices in naval warfare where scattering forces has often served to defend against threats more effectively and create multiple points of engagement.